Page 60 - Anatomy-of-a-Fraud
P. 60

Quintero, professor of Constitutional and Administrative Law at the Panamá
                     University, former Dean of the Law School, a past president of the National Bar, was
                     a distinguished jurist in his late sixties, a capable and independent man, but a weak
                     person. He had sufficient scruples to denounce irregularities but apparently, he lacked
                     the strength of character needed to act in the face of the constant violations that he
                     himself  revealed.  He  was,  in  fact,  the  ideal  man  to  legitimize  what  would  be  an
                     essentially  fraudulent  electoral  process.  On  the  one  hand,  he  possessed  a  certain
                     credibility; on the other, he posed no serious threat to the General Staff’s scheme to
                     make Barletta president at any cost.

                             That was then, the make-up of the new Electoral Tribunal: three justices, two
                     of them doing the government’s bidding and the other a capable, independent but weak
                     man.

                             Two plus zero makes three.





                              B.    “Imagine! They don’t pay any attention to me!”


                             The Electoral Tribunal that Quintero had been appointed to preside over was
                     a court discredited by the numerous scandals that had been taking place with impunity
                     during the years before its reorganization. Yet, Quintero did not remove any senior
                     officials, some of whom had obviously been involved in previous irregularities. A case
                     in point is the secretary general, who kept his job even though he made no secret of his
                     PRD leanings and that he had been involved, in one way or another, in the scandals
                     that led to the ostensible reorganization of the Tribunal.

                             In  1977,  to  give  an  example  of  these  irregularities,  the  plebiscite  on  the
                     Torrijos-Carter Treaties was held with no previous electoral registration; according to
                                                                                                      20
                     the Tribunal’s questionable figures, 97.33 % of the electorate voted at the plebiscite.
                     In  1978,  at  three  o’clock  in  the  afternoon  on  the  day  of  the  elections  for  district
                     representatives,  the  Electoral  Tribunal  tolerated  anonymous  orders  to  be  issued,
                     authorizing  unregistered  citizens  to  vote.  This  resulted  in  large  numbers  of  pro-
                     government  voters,  having  been  forewarned  of  this  unusual  relaxation  of  electoral
                     requirements, casting more than one vote. Finally, during the 1980 legislative elections,
                     no balloting was held in 30 communities in the Province of Veraguas in order to favor
                     the pro-government candidate, a first cousin of Torrijos’s who was not very popular in
                     the area. The same convenient method was used in Bocas del Toro, where no voting

                     20
                       Linares, Julio E., Tratado concerniente a la neutralidad permanente y a la neutralidad del
                     Canal de Panamá. De un colonialismo rooseveltiano a un neocolonialismo senatorial. Litografía e
                     Imprenta LIL, S.A., San José, 1983, page 143. This masterful study reveals, among other things, how
                     the regime, through lies and stratagems, trampling upon civil liberties and, looking out only for its
                     survival, perpetually mortgaged our sovereignty.
   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65