Page 70 - Anatomy-of-a-Fraud
P. 70

But,  to  come  to  an  “understanding”  with  the  chiefs,  i.e.,  to  buy  massive
                     numbers of votes, there must be a buyer. And it so happened that the Electoral Tribunal
                     charged  three  retired  Defense  Forces  officers  with  the  task  of  ferrying  the  official
                     returns  tally  sheet  back  from  San  Blas.  This  choice  was  harshly  attacked  by  the
                     opposition for its manifest implications of partiality and fraud.

                             In addition, two Indian brothers, Horacio, and Héctor Smith, denounced the
                     “monetary” frauds, i.e., the systematic and massive buying of votes in San Blas, in an
                     article published in La Prensa, page 8C, on June 7.

                             Final returns from San Blas were:

                                                                   UNADE    =    9,272
                                                         ADO          =       903




                             And Barletta would later say that he won fair and square!





                             UNADE also bought numerous votes in the central provinces, particularly in
                     Herrera and Los Santos. Contrary to what happened in San Blas, though, no Electoral
                     Tribunal  justice  acknowledged  this  crime,  not  even  implicitly.  In  addition  to  old-
                     fashioned vote-buying (the price fluctuated between $5.00 and $20.00), the “rental”
                     and “dog-earing” of voter registration cards were also  frequent  in  these provinces.
                     Cards were rented so that the “lessee” could vote twice or more, depending on the
                     number of cards he would rent. They were also dogeared at the point indicated by the
                     Electoral Board so that known or potential opposition supporters could not vote.

                             As  regards  the  rental  of  voter  registration  cards,  inquisitive  readers  may
                     wonder why the bearer’s identity was not ascertained. The task of establishing voter
                     identity  was  left  to  the  Electoral  Tribunal  officials  assigned  to  each  precinct.  In
                     numerous cases these officials were UNADE supporters and openly countenanced this
                     fraud.

                             Point 17 of the bishop’s statement, “Abuses in connection with the actual
                     voting”, clearly denounces these electoral crimes: “In quite a few cases the prevailing
                     attitude is the old approach of ‘winning by any means’; through vote-buying, the dog-
                     earing of cards, the distribution of liquor…”. (See exhibit 18).
                             There are also many witnesses and newspaper report on this point. See, for
                     instance, La Prensa, May 10 and 13, pages 8C and 10C, respectively, and June 7, page
                     8C. Also see Ya, May 12, page 2.
   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75