Page 67 - Anatomy-of-a-Fraud
P. 67

Organization  Head,  Félix  Gómez  stated,  as  reported  by  La  Prensa,  that  “…  the
                     Defense Force had not supplied any names and that he only had nine names filed by
                                             24
                     the Penonomé Hospital”.
                             This notwithstanding, the Electoral Tribunal drew up a “Special Listing” with
                     more  than  17,000  names,  including  approximately  8,000  national  guardsmen,  and
                     handed it to PDC officials on May 5, one day before the election.

                             Two different things took place here. The first is the obvious violation of the
                     Electoral Code by the Defense Forces and the Electoral Tribunal itself as regards the
                     dates on which they were required to produce the “Special Listing”. The second, far
                     more serious considering its potential for generating fraudulent votes, was that it made
                     it possible for at least 8,000 national guardsmen and 9,000 other officials to vote twice
                     under no supervision or control by opposition parties.

                             Finally, and to support the accusations made in the previous paragraphs, we
                     shall  mention  the  astonishing  but  incontrovertible  fact  that  Maximiliano  Gordon,
                     Electoral Tribunal Systems Director, i.e., –the person responsible for the computers
                     that generated the official voter registration rolls– was under arrest for at least two or
                     three hours on the night of May 4 for having refused to comply with an order from the
                     Defense Forces. Who knows in what ways Defense Forces operatives on duty at the
                     Electoral Tribunal tampered with the computers during Gordon’s absence?

                             Was it then that the “cybernetic” fraud was perpetrated or was it when the
                     factitious lists were prepared? These tools of fraud were voter lists for precincts located
                     in areas where the regime knew it was unpopular, such as Circuit 4-4 in the Guaymi
                     Indian area. These factitious listings included supporters of the regime who would
                     otherwise have been unable to vote –since their names did not appear in the Electoral
                     Registry– and excluded known opposition supporters.

                             Likely,  we  shall  never  know  what  was  done  with  the  computers  during
                     Gordon’s absence. But we do know that the office of the Electoral Tribunal Systems
                     Director was under the direct control of the Defense Forces on the evening of May 4
                     and not exactly for repair purposes. Moreover, Gordon was not allowed to return to his
                     office for several days following the elections.





                            And Barletta would later say that he won fair and square!








                     24  La Prensa, April 30, 1984, page 1A.
   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72