Page 87 - Anatomy-of-a-Fraud
P. 87

Exhibit 22 reproduces the resolution adopted by the National Returns Board
                     on May 11. Exhibit 23 is the statement to the country made that same day by the
                     opposition  parties,  explaining  ADO’s  viewpoint  in  connection  with  the  tallying  of
                     returns on the National level.
                             Both documents will be studied in depth in the following section, where we
                     shall also analyze the Electoral Tribunal’s behavior following the date on which it
                     received the circuit tally sheets from the National Returns Board.



                           D.   He who counts also elects – Part II



                             On May 14, the alternate chairman, the secretary and the recently appointed
                     third member of the  National  Returns Board, Pitti,  Levy and Tejeira, respectively,
                     appeared before the Electoral Tribunal to file the 39 circuits tally sheets and the May
                     11 resolutions already mentioned in the previous section. The presiding justice of the
                     highest electoral body of the land, Ismael García, was not present at these proceedings.
                     He had stepped down several  days before. Gadeloff and Fernández decided not  to
                     participate any further in the by now obvious farce.


                                  “The secretary delivered the tally sheets, attached
                                  documents and recordings of the sessions…
                                  Thereupon the presiding justice asked Levy to clarify
                                  whether the claims made by the ADO parties in a
                                              30

                                  letter to his office (see exhibit 25) were true. ADO
                                  claimed that only five circuit tally sheets had actually
                                  been reviewed and that 34 others remained to be
                                  inspected. In the presence of national and foreign

                                  newsmen covering the proceedings, Levy
                                  acknowledged that only five tally sheets had been
                                  reviewed, while the remaining 34 had only received a
                                  cursory reading. Quintero insisted three times (he

                                  could not believe his ears) with Pitti and Levy but
                                  their answers were the same in every instance: only
                                  five tally sheets had been reviewed; the other 34 had
                                  only been read”32.




                             Quintero  then  received  the  unusual  resolution.  And  that  was  indeed  the
                     regime’s strategy: to take the decision as to the winner away from the National Returns


                     30  La Prensa, May 15, 1984, page 1A.
   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92